Comparative analysis of primary prosthetic fitting outcomes in transtibial amputees using additive manufacturing technologies
Demchenko N.A., Nikolaenko A.N., Ermishin V.M., Borisov A.P.
Samara State Medical University,
443099, Russian Federation, Samara, Chapaevskaya St., 89
Brief summary
Introduction. Currently, there is a tendency towards an increase in the number of amputations of the lower extremities, including due to armed conflicts. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop additive technologies that open up new opportunities for a personalized approach to creating culturally acceptable sleeves.
Objective: comparative analysis of the effectiveness of primary prosthetics of patients with amputation at the level of the lower leg using various additive technologies - FDM printer and PDI Squirt Shape 3D printer
Methods. The study was conducted from November 2024 to February 2025. The criteria for including patients in the study: local injuries of traumatic, inflammatory or vascular genesis, the prescription of which did not exceed 12 weeks, in the absence of defects in the leg stump after amputation, preservation of soft tissue trophism, consistency of the postoperative scar, the absence of decompensated forms of chronic diseases and concomitant conditions that threaten the lives of patients. Prosthetics were performed using digital modeling and 3D printing of cultural receiving sleeves. Rehabilitation efficacy was assessed on the basis of biomechanical gait parameters at two stages of dynamic control (immediately after prosthetics and after 8 weeks), as well as on the time characteristics of the prosthesis. The study results were processed statistically using Microsoft Excel and Biostatistics spreadsheets.
Results. The study included 10 patients divided into two equal groups. The results showed that prosthetics using PDI Squirt Shape 3D Printer provided higher walking speed (by 7.4%), better gait rhythm (rhythm coefficient 0.95 ± 0.04, p ≥ 0.05) and significantly reduced prosthesis manufacturing time compared to classical FDM printing (on average 4.5 times, p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusions. It was concluded that the use of PDI Squirt Shape technology in clinical practice is promising as a tool to improve the quality of prosthetics and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients with post-amputation defects of the lower leg. Due to the fact that our study was performed on a small number of patients, this problem should be further studied.
Key words
Transtibial amputation; limb prosthetics; digital technologies; additive manufacturing; rehabilitation
1. Chypryaev V.A., Kydyashev A.L., Hominec V.V., i dr. Osobennosti lecheniya ranenih s ampytacionnimi defektami nijnih konechnostei v sochetanii s perelomami kostei. Vestnik Nacionalnogo mediko-hiryrgicheskogo centra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2024;19(1):143-148. https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_19_1_143
2. Syslyaev V.G., Vladimirova O.N., Sherbina K.K., i dr. Rol rannego pervichnogo protezirovaniya v sisteme reabilitacii voennoslyjashih vsledstvie voennoi travmi: organizacionnie, uridicheskie, metodicheskie aspekti. Vestnik Rossiiskoi voenno-medicinskoi akademii. 2018; 2 (62): 40-47. https://journals.eco-vector.com/1682-7392/article/view/12218/9626
4. Li Y., He L., Lu X., et al. Clinical Characteristics, Quality of Life, and Risk Factors of Amputation Stump Skin Disease and Stump Fungal Infection in Adult Amputees in Shanghai, China. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:868431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.868431
5. Golovin M.A., Yankovskii V.M., Klimenko F.N., i dr. Primenenie additivnih tehnologii pri pervichnom protezirovanii konechnostei. Sovremennie naykoemkie tehnologii. 2023; 2: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.39521
6. Ribeiro D., Cimino S.R., Mayo A.L., et al. 3D printing and amputation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(2):221-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1646825
7. Choo Y.J., Kim J.H., Chang M.C. Three-dimensional printing technology applied to the production of prosthesis: A systemic narrative review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 202418;49(3):344-352. https://doi.org/10.1097 /PXR.0000000000000366
8. Bełżek A., Żerebiec M., Saj N., et al. Advances in 3D printed orthotics for rehabilitation. Wiad Lek. 2025;78(3):539-543. https://doi.org/10.36740/ WLek/202602
9. Ramlee M.H., Ammarullah M.I., Mohd Sukri N.S., et al. Investigation on three-dimensional printed prosthetics leg sockets coated with different reinforcement materials: analysis on mechanical strength and microstructural. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57454-8
10. Manero A., Smith P., Sparkman J., et al. Implementation of 3D Printing Technology in the Field of Prosthetics: Past, Present, and Future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091641