Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, Federal State Unitary Enterprise, Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Brief summary
A personalized approach in experimental toxicology expands the prospects of toxicological and hygienic assessment of hazardous chemical compounds in order to identify individual sensitivity and characteristics of their toxic effects using genetic, genomic (epigenomic) and other molecular diagnostic methods to improve early diagnosis of chemically caused diseases in order to maintain the health of individuals, in contact with these substances.
Key words
chemical substance, toxicity, personalized approach, genotype, epigenome
1. Baranov V.S. Programma «Genom cheloveka» kak naychnaya osnova profilak-ticheskoi medicini / Vestnik RAMN. 2000. N 10. S. 27-37.
2. Baranov V.S., Baranova E.V. Evoluciya molekylyarnoi medicini: ot elek-tronnogo «geneticheskogo pasporta» do genomnoi elektronnoi karti zdorovya / Molekylyarno-biologicheskie tehnologii v medicinskoi praktike. 2016. T. 24. S. 3-17.
3. Hood L., Friend S.H. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine / Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 184-187.
4. Jain K.K. Textbook of Personalized Medicine / Hum. Press.: NY. 2015. 732 p. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2553-7
5. Hale V.G., Woo K., Lipton H.L. Oxymoron no more: the potential of nonprofit drug companies to deliver on the promise of medicines for the developing world // Health Affairs. 2005. Vol. 24. N 4. P.1057-1063. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1057
6. Rembovskii V. R., Mogilenkova L. A. Processi detoksikacii pri vozdeistvii himicheskih veshestv na organizm. SPb.: Izd-vo PTY. 2017. 383 c.
8. Karkishenko N.N., Ryabih V.P., Karkishenko V.N., Koloskova E.M. Sozdanie gymanizirovannih mishei dlya farmakotoksikologicheskih issledovanii (yspehi, neydachi i perspektivi) / Biomedicina. 2014. T. 3. C. 4-22.
9. Dujikova N.A., Daev E.V. Genom i stress-reakciya y jivotnih i cheloveka / Ekologicheskaya genetika. 2018. T. 16. N 1. C. 4-26. doi: 10.17816/ecogen1614-26.
10. Gräff J., Kim D., Dobbin M.M., Tsai L.H. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in physiological and pathological brain processes // Physiol. Rev. 2011. Vol. 91. N 2. P. 603-649. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2010
11. Tsankova N.M., Berton O., Renthal W. et al. Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action / Nat. Neurosci. 2006. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 519-525. doi: 10.1038/nn1659.
12. Tsankova N.M., Kumar A., Nestler E.J. Histone modifications at gene promoter regions in rat hippocampus after acute and chronic electroconvulsive seizures / J. Neurosci. 2004. Vol. 24, N 24. P. 5603-5610. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0589-04.2004
13. Tsuji M., Miyagawa K., Takeda H. Epigenetic Regulation of Resistance to Emotional Stress: Possible Involvement of 5-HT1A Receptor-Mediated Histone Acetylation / J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014. Vol. 125. N 4. S. 347-354. doi: 10.1254/jphs.14r07cp
14. Xu L., Sun Y., Gao L. et al. Prenatal restraint stress is associated with demethylation of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) promoter and enhances CRH transcriptional responses to stress in adolescent rats / Neurochem. Res. 2014. Vol. 39. N 7. P. 1193-1198. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1296-0.
15. Murgatroyd C., Spengler D. Epigenetic programming of the HPA axis: early life decides / Stress. 2011. Vol.14. N6. P.581-589. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2011.602146.
16. McGowan P.O., Hope T.A., Meck W.H. et al. Impaired social recognition memory in recombination activating gene 1-deficient mice / Brain Res. 2011. Vol. 1383. P.187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.054.
17. Misiewicz Z., Iurato S., Kulesskaya N., Salminen L. et al. Multi-omics analysis identifies mitochondrial pathways associated with anxiety-related behavior / PLoS genetics. 2019. Vol. 15. N 9. e1008358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008358.